Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Widget HTML #1

[DOWNLOAD] "Kane v. Johns-Manville Corp." by United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit # eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

Kane v. Johns-Manville Corp.

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: Kane v. Johns-Manville Corp.
  • Author : United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
  • Release Date : January 30, 1988
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 74 KB

Description

This appeal challenges the lawfulness of the reorganization plan of the Johns-Manville Corporation ("Manville"), a debtor in one of the nations most significant Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. Lawrence Kane, on behalf of himself and a group of other personal injury claimants, appeals from an order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Whitman Knapp, Judge) affirming an order of the Bankruptcy Court (Burton R. Lifland, Chief Judge) that confirmed a Second Amended Plan of Reorganization (the "Plan"). Kane and the group of 765 individuals he represents (collectively "Kane") are persons with asbestos-related disease who had filed personal injury suits against Manville prior to Manvilles Chapter 11 petition. The suits were stayed, and Kane and other claimants presently afflicted with asbestos-related disease were designated as Class-4 creditors in the reorganization proceedings. Kane now objects to confirmation of the reorganization Plan on several grounds: it discharges the rights of future asbestos victims who do not have "claims" within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 101(4) (1982), it was adopted without constitutionally adequate notice to various interested parties, the voting procedures used in approving the Plan violated the Bankruptcy Code and due process requirements, and the Plan fails to conform with the requirements of 11 U.S.C. § 1129(a) and (b) (1982 & Supp. IV 1986). We determine that Kane lacks standing to challenge the Plan on the grounds that it violates the rights of future claimants and other third parties, and we reject on the merits his remaining claims that the Plan violates his rights regarding voting and fails to meet the requirements of section 1129(a) and (b). The order of the District Court affirming the Bankruptcy Courts confirmation of the Plan is affirmed.


PDF Books "Kane v. Johns-Manville Corp." Online ePub Kindle